Case study
Capacity planning redesigned from a spreadsheet bottleneck
We mapped the end-to-end planning workflow and co-designed a clearer future state for rostering, project allocation and reporting with their technical leadership team.
635
planning columns mapped
36
staff in capacity model
33+
active projects tracked
Context
This client was running complex multi-project planning through a single large spreadsheet. The operational intent was strong, but the tool structure made forward visibility and coordination increasingly difficult.
What Needed Attention
- The core planning file had 635 date columns and was difficult to navigate or maintain.
- At least 36 staff and 33+ active projects needed concurrent visibility.
- Resource forecasting, conflict detection and scenario planning were constrained by spreadsheet mechanics.
How We Worked
- Documented current-state planning practice in detail, including roster, leave and project allocation dependencies.
- Assessed platform options against real planning requirements, not feature checklists alone.
- Designed a future-state workflow integrating capacity, allocation and reporting logic.
- Prepared an implementation path that balanced operational continuity with staged improvement.
Outcomes
- The business gained a clear map from current-state pain points to implementable workflow changes.
- Capacity planning requirements were translated into concrete system and process decisions.
- Leadership had stronger visibility of the trade-offs between spreadsheet persistence and platform transition.
Engagement Profile
Structured assessment and design engagement with leadership and operational stakeholders.
Evidence Base
- Capacity planning assessment artefacts based on live operating files.
- Requirements matrix for platform suitability and future-state fit.
- Future-state workflow design covering rostering, allocation and reporting.
Client details are anonymised; metrics are drawn from project records and de-identified artefacts.
Back to all case studies